Someone quipped on
LinkedIn that there was no cogent plan in Afghanistan. Cogent plans
don't work anyway. There are two and only two planning strategies
that work: Done by the Book, or Completely Wing it. Half is half too
short or too long. The key to understanding the penchant for
incompetence in the military profession I got from a seriously important book:
Dixon posits that there is a definite profile to the commander that freeze up in the clinch, Or they stick to a bad decision regardless, His profile places the blame on the Anal Retentive. This is Freudian which relates the Anal personality on bad potty training. Unfortunately Ass Holes act exactly the same everywhere, where the English Public School Potty Training System does not apply. Regardless, the typology is worth memorizing for your own protection.
The Anal Retentive
obsessed with messes, seeks to put reality in something measurable,
Adrian Monk comes to mind, except that Adrian's obsession with neatness did not
defeat his quest for the missing parts,
ADRIAN MONK THE OCD PI |
In my experience in
Vietnam metrics were God.
One could report the
number on enemy KIA by the number of rounds fired into the presumed enemy
positions.
1st AIR CAVALRY DIVISION DTOC 1968 |
Contact with the enemy
had to be parsed into two sets of reports, G2 and G3, The G2 could only
report enemy initiated attacks, All attacks or contacts as a result of
friendly action were sent up G3 channels. While in the DTOC, 1st Air
Cavalry we two and three got the story straight before transmitting to IIFFV.
After Tet, we had a
working operational schema although differences between flag rank units often
precluded lateral contact. The hide and seek games between G2 and G3 was
discouraged by MG George I Forsyth, the Unflappable
G2-G3 OPERATIONS DESK, 1ST AIR CAV DIV 1969 |
The important thing to
remember about any war is that the Freudian typology of Oral, Anal and Phallic
applies to Stafflophucupus if not treated with a real shit
storm. Being Oral, I write and brief to the point of
screaming fits heard in my CEP.
1/9th AIR CAVALRY SQUADRON - 1ST AIR CAV DIV |
Anal types have
two flavors, expulsive and retentive. The Retentive make order out
of chaos, but everything not dressed right and covered down is a mess. Those
whose forte is cleaning up messes is a battle cry, and recognition for
excellence. The Retentive clean up anything, and looks for messes
about to happen. The Expulsive (expletive) shits on anything and anywhere.
Between the two, the rest of us emote.
DECEMBER 6-7, 1941 |
Their cleanups create
serious messes. At Pearl Harbor, the weapons were locked up (as they are now)
in order to retain a proper count and inventory. The airplanes were
lined up neatly in the center of the fields to defend against Nisei sabotage.
The neatly lined up ships on battleship row had their hatches open to cool
the ships interior so that the expected inspecting officers would not get
sweat stains on the white,
The Battle of Isandlwana
in Natal on January 22, 1879 the British under LTG Lord Chelmsford was wiped
out by the Zulus under Ntshingwayo Khoza. The Quartermaster had ordered
the boxes of ammo screwed shut to prevent pilfering.
FIRST RANK FIRE! |
Then came the Battle of
Roark's Drift where real professionals defeated a world of deep
shit. The thing is knowing what is going on, what is on hand, what
the troops can do, and have things already rigged for unexpected action.
The symptoms of Dixon's
Duds are here. Like in artillery, the round doesn't detonate on
contact. The Dud aren't always duds, as they can be inspiring,
brave, brilliant, innovative but freezes when the situation gets out of hand.
Paulus at Stalingrad and McDowell at Antietam, are good examples. These
officers, obsessed with detail are critical as war is very messy, and
without the compulsive neat freak, the ammo doesn't get there.
DR DIXON'S SYMPTOMS OF PENDNG DOOM |
The US Army has been
hamstrung by the Personnel Pukes once known as the Adjutant General (AG) who
place the neatness of accountability and micro managed career rotation
algorithms. In Vietnam, AG would not put a replacement to a unit
(rifle companies included) until the trooper had departed on DEROS. This
added at least three months to the replacement arriving. I never saw a
rifle company in the field with more than 110 troops. This particular problem
was addressed by the concept of a personnel float that is assigned to fill a slot
about to happen.
WHY IS THIS IN CHINESE? |
This AG Stuck Up reared
it's head as a prime motive or ARPERCEN (rotational expeditionary modular
brigades) spent two years doing what should have been done in concurrent
training before addressing the unit, These units were projected to arrive
in a published (Army Times) schedule. What the Taliban, Insurgents, and
Al Qaeda were doing or about to do wasn't addressed until the unit was inbound.
Efforts to provide
overlap between commanders and by constant and extraordinary update of
the tactical milieu reduced the FUBAR potential somewhat. In Vietnam,
every individual had a short timer's chat, but the units was staying in country.
This individual rotation created a penchant for being seriously killed or
wounded for the FNG, Achilles and the Short (not knowing, over confidence,
overly cautious).
TON SUN NHUT 1968 |
On the other more
important hand, the advantage of the individual rotation rota was
the steadily increasing combat effectiveness kept up to date by enemy action
and at the end of the war came a corps of officers and noncoms that built the
Army we have today. The increase in sophistication survived several
decades.
On the other hand, after WW 2 the quality
of the US Army virtually disappeared as the NKPA crossed the 38th. It had
only been less than five years since the same Army had defeated the Japanese
and Germans,