Fake Officers & FUBAR in the Pentagon
1
The Transformed by the Fake |
(The
President) shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate,
shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the
supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments
are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law:
but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers as
they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the
Heads of Departments.
The fact that these fake officers have not been confirmed by
the Senate breaks the Constitutional limits and controls over the military,
judiciary, and executive personnel in critical positions considered expressions
of the sovereignty of these United States.
All such “Officers of the United States” include ambassadors, consuls,
cabinet members, federal judges, and all military officers down to Butter
Bar. As such, each Officers’ word is
law, enforceable in court as such.
Survival Imperatives Differ - Officers vs Civil Servants
The survival imperatives of Civil Servants vs military officers differ dramatically between the Job Description vs the Efficiency Report (OER) on file. The Personnel File, once called the 201 File, contains the list of assignments and schools together with associated OER. One slip, and late in one’s career it can end under the Up or Out policy. This hits usually in the Second Decade of service with odds as low as fifty percent for survival, depending upon the current SWAG. Been there, done that.
The survival imperatives of Civil Servants vs military officers differ dramatically between the Job Description vs the Efficiency Report (OER) on file. The Personnel File, once called the 201 File, contains the list of assignments and schools together with associated OER. One slip, and late in one’s career it can end under the Up or Out policy. This hits usually in the Second Decade of service with odds as low as fifty percent for survival, depending upon the current SWAG. Been there, done that.
The Officer’s career assignments are determined on a
competitive and centrally controlled process.
The end result is the selection of officers in senior grades, usually
O-6 (Colonel and Navy Captain) who has the expected preparation and
performance.
2
The Civil Service Job Description and table of organization
gives authority and territory upon which continued employment is grounded. This
is dependent upon connections, favors, and a strangle hold over processes. The assignments of Civil Servants are
principally under the control of the Servant, with the selection and promotion
process subject to compromise and manufacture. It is rigged, and with few
external set of standards applied to selections for promotion or
assignment. Been there, done that.
This lack of objective standards of performance or
experience, taken collectively and protectively, mandates that military
expertise by the military becomes a clear and present danger to civil service
survival. Complementing this banality is
that the officers caught up in Civil Service traps must play the part of a
puppet on a string. This is how we lost
the Middle East.
WE KNEW THE
CULTURE BEFORE
The current flap over ISIS, and of the diminished capacity
of Iraq and Afghanistan to dealing with irregular and peer enemy forces,
despite over fifteen years of US military effort and trillions of dollars, were
preventable had the effort been fought by Officers of the United States,
without the fatal influence of Fake Officers of the SES and their crony
contractors.
The post mortems posted about the prewar estimates and post
war operations has been laid at the door of cultural arrogance and incompetence
at the level where the difference between Shia and Sunni was dismissed, in
favor of a turnkey Kansas under the baleful gaze of Neo-Conservatives. The blame has been shifted in-house to
denounce stability (nation building) as a righteous military mission.
The problem with that assessment is that it ignores that the
US Army had trained for decades in Rear Area Combat Operations (RACO), Civil
Affairs and Military Government, and Psychological Operations all of which I
had extensive exposure to during that training effort which filled the time
between Vietnam and 9-11. Likewise, the
capacity to operate at Field Army level with multiple corps and divisions was
destroyed.
In order for an officer to get his or her Military
Occupational Specialty (MOS) prior to 9-11 approved in CA and PSYOPS, one had
to submit a PSYOP or Civil Affairs Estimate of the Situation that necessarily
covered such niceties as Shia and Sunni.
Or Pashtunwali. Where did these
estimates go?
3
Draft of What Was Known in CA and PSYOP |
Why were the capacities to fix and administer devastated
and/or conquered territories for which preparations long precede D-day, H-Hour
deleted? Instead of Civil Affairs
brigades and PSYOP groups prepping the battlefield, only a handful of Army
Reserve Officers were given a back seat at the briefing.
TENURED (SES)
AND THE TEMPORARY (Officers)
Rumsfeld has long left the Pentagon, but the programs that
he advanced had been long in the plotting, going back to, at least, Desert
Storm. It occurred to a number of my
fellow veterans that the “Regular Army” was at fault proceeding with policies
that guaranteed their promotions in a competitive fashion, over the necessities
of actually winning in war. Military
officers’ tenure in the Pentagon, however, rarely exceed four years, and
usually run three. It is not possible
for a decades long military doctrine run from inside the Pentagon be done with
the connivance of commissioned officers of the United States. They then are the hand puppets of those
permanent employees (Civil Service) welded to their desks.
COMBAT SERVICE
SUPORT
The glue that held Field Army and Corps operations together
was the force structure in the US Army Reserve, and to a large extent the Army
National Guard with counterparts in the Air Force and other services. The glue came about due to the unglamorous
role that glue, as in logistics and service support did not facilitate
competitive promotions in the Active Components. The result was the massive transfer of
unglamorous activities (service support and combat service support) to the
Reserve Components.
Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait brought a sudden and traumatic
shock to the Pentagon that the US Army, nor other services, could go to war
without the Reserve Components.
4
ARFORGEN
Once Baghdad had been secured, however, the glue was
dissolved as was the corps along with the core of logistics, combat service
support, which was banished from the Army dictionary as defunct and
obsolete. Since then, large scale
maneuvers became problematic at best with maneuver replaced by rotation under
ARFORGEN (Army Force Generation) designed to provide equitable opportunity to
participate in combat for promotion and career development purposes.
5
Likewise, while all units in the Armed Forces had been
aligned to war time plans, the new “transformation” mandate under Rumsfeld,
replaced any coherent defense strategy with blizzards of “snowflakes” from his
imperial orifice. Rumsfeld had taken
the measure to transfer senior military officers to the field where they could
be more useful, and replaced them with senior civil servants aka Senior
Executive Service aka SES. Then
abolished the field commands these military officers might have been assigned
to.
6
Under Transformation, the Corps was abolished and along with
it the well-oiled close air support system was broken from the days when a
request for an airstrike was monitored by the Air Force and silence was
approval. Too many Medals for Valor
including the Medal of Honor have been awarded due to a failure of approval of
immediate airstrikes due to the abolition of the Corps.
7
PREPLANNED AND IMMEDIATE AIR SUPPORT |
Such was the case of the “transformation” process that
proceeded to create a collection of “units of action” (instead of companies,
battalions, regiments and brigades) that would be perfectly suited for future
combat, the shape of which was to be determined by magic crystal ball. Said crystal ball being ensconced in the
Office of Net Assessments, which was designed to destroy the Services’ pet
projects. And “verified” by war gaming
but not validated by the Schools or the Field.
8
Any policy that has a life of over three years is not likely
from a military staff in the Pentagon. In previous years, the Army was divided
into “branches” (Armor, Artillery, Military Intelligence, etc) which branches
governed doctrine and training and was active in procurement. Branches have been abolished, and the
dominance of doctrine and equipment has been sucked up into the Pentagon, and
away from the Service Schools that melded field experience with national
requirements. The operative model for
Transformation was to turn the Army into modular units like ships in the Navy.
Rummy was Navy.
9
TASK ORGANIZATION TOO COMPLICATED FOR REMFS |
The Senior Executive Service (SES) which operates as if it
were consisting of Generals and Colonels, are not “officers of the United
States”, and their directives should not be considered “orders” in the military
sense as they do not convey the sovereignty of these United States. The oath of enlistment or office for service
members requires obedience to the “officers” appointed over them, which Civil
Servants are not.
10
TRANSFORMED INTO TABLES FROM ON HIGH |
While a purge of those fake officers is not practical, the
severance of the malignancy from the chain of command is easily obtained by the
Senate saying that it will not consider any efficiency of fitness report by
other than an Officer of the United States” in the process of confirming the
promotions of military officers. This
will instantly produce a REMF stampede from the Pentagon of officers seeking
real units to serve in. These can be
readily funded by the shredding of the payrolls of the SES.
11
If need be, those whose services are essential can be
presented to the Senate for approval and concurrence. In that manner, the Senate regains control
over a Pentagon run wild. In addition, lateral entry of personnel and units as
has been the wartime custom since before George Washington, can be set up.
A UNIFORMED
GENERAL STAFF CORPS!
And, finally, the Army needs a General Staff Corps trained
to run things from the top, to provide the linkage between brass and
field. After WW 1, the concept of a
General Staff was denounced as too Germanic.
12
In addition, and foremost, the present efforts of the Army
to reconstitute itself must be supported in defiance of those whose payroll
depends upon its demise. Corps and divisions are being reassembled along with
the necessary combat service support (logistics).
Gordon S Fowkes, LTC USA RET, KCTJ